Cem Ilkel vs Kyle Edmund Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Edmund analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Kyle Edmund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 45.99% of points on his second serve, while Edmund has won 52.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Edmund has won 52.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.61% and 30.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Edmund has saved 61.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40% of matches played (W/L 20/ 30), with Edmund winning 62.79% (W/L 27/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 55/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 13/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18), where as Edmund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.92% of matches (W/L 20/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Edmund winning 1. The last match between Ilkel and Edmund was at the Lugano Challenger, 03-03-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:23:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Edmund have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ilkel winning 1 times and Edmund 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 1, and Edmund 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.72 while Edmund has played against players with an average rank of 323.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Edmund has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 41.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Edmund has converted 39.8% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Edmund
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
417
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
440
Rank
14
High
29
Age
R
Plays
15
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
2
Main
7
Minor
Form
56% (401-312)
Career Total W/L
61% (334-214)
41% (9-13)
YTD W/L
61% (17-11)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$3,623,010
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cem Ilkel | Kyle Edmund |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 14 |
Aces (Total) | 12 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 2:23:1 | 2:23:1 |
1st Serve % | 55% (56/102) | 55% (54/98) |
1st Serve Win% | 80% (45/56) | 70% (38/54) |
2nd Serve Win% | 41% (19/46) | 48% (21/44) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 25% (3/12) |
Return Points W% | 40% (39/98) | 37% (38/102) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cem Ilkel | Kyle Edmund |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 41% (9/13) | 61% (17/11) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (19/29) | 59% (40/28) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (194/239) | 53% (348/307) |
Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 68% (13/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.49 | 0.4 |
Aces Total | 102 | 127 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.27 |
DFs Total | 47 | 87 |
Avg Match Time | 1:27:22 | 1:47:22 |
Avg Opp Rank | 171.45 | 348 |
1st Serve % | 58% (748/1300) | 58% (1177/2015) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (527/748) | 72% (852/1177) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (257/552) | 52% (438/838) |
BPs Won% Total | 40% (37/93) | 40% (80/201) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (452/1257) | 39% (787/2034) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 41% (7/10) |
Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 91% (10/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 61% (17/28) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 27% (3/11) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 50% (6/12) |
1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 74% (19/14) |
1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 26% (19/5) |
1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 33% (9/3) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Arthur Gea
Player
Kyle Edmund
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kyle Edmund
Player
Keenan Mayo
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kyle Edmund
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Kyle Edmund
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kyle Edmund
Player
Gerald Melzer
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Kyle Edmund
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H |
view more